This is the problem with the article "Fukushima Radiation Has Contaminated The Entire Pacific Ocean (And It's Going To Get Worse)" that appeared over at Zero Hedge yesterday. In it, we have a rehash of the Fukushima disaster of 2011, which generated a horrific tsunami and breached a nuclear power plant. The combined effects of the earthquake and its aftermath cost almost 16,000 lives, and left 230,000 people homeless -- some of whom are still living in temporary housing.
Unfortunately, that's about where the Zero Hedge article stops being factual and starts relying on sensationalist exaggerations and outright fabrication. Here's a brief list of the inaccurate claims that appear on the article:
- "[The Fukushima earthquake was] believed to be an aftershock of the 2010 earthquake in Chile."
If that weren’t bad enough:
- "Fukushima continues to leak an astounding 300 tons of radioactive waste into the Pacific Ocean every day."
- "It should come as no surprise, then, that Fukushima has contaminated the entire Pacific Ocean in just five years."
- "Not long after Fukushima, fish in Canada began bleeding from their gills, mouths, and eyeballs. This “disease” has been ignored by the government and has decimated native fish populations, including the North Pacific herring."
Also, correlation does not imply causation. Even if viral hemorrhagic septicemia had only been seen after debris from Fukushima washed ashore, it wouldn't necessarily mean that the contaminants in the debris had caused the disease.
- "Elsewhere in Western Canada, independent scientists have measured a 300% increase in the level of radiation."
- "Further south in Oregon, USA, starfish began losing legs and then disintegrating entirely when Fukushima radiation arrived there in 2013. Now, they are dying in record amounts, putting the entire oceanic ecosystem in that area at risk.
And no alarmist article would be complete without some scary pictures. First, we have this one, from NOAA:
This has nothing to do with radiation leakage. It's a map tracking wave heights of the tsunami as it crossed the Pacific, as you'd know if you had looked at the scale on the right hand side.
Then there's this one:
Which shows a bunch of dead starfish. But as I established a couple of paragraphs ago, this has nothing to do with radiation poisoning.
And so on and so forth. The alarmist foolishness in articles like this is dangerous from a couple of standpoints. First, it makes it sound like the scientists themselves are ignorant of what's going on, or (worse) are actively covering it up for their own malign purposes. Second, it misrepresents what the science actually says. Third, it distracts us from problems that actually are global catastrophes in the making by focusing our attention elsewhere.
At a less-than-careful reading, though, such an article sounds well researched and factually accurate. It has links, sources cited, uses technical vocabulary. It's only if you take the time to do some research yourself that the whole thing collapses like a house of cards.
So caveat lector. As usual. And to the people who keep forwarding this article around, I'm respectfully asking you to stop. It's hard enough to get people to trust legitimate science these days; this kind of thing only makes it worse.